As serious crimes, especially murder, continue to grip T&T today in all forms and fashion, we need all hands on deck to fight the criminal elements from various vantage points. We have to maximise the use of current resources.
Seriously, all stakeholders have their important and peculiar roles to play. However, there is one critical element that can make a significant contribution in fighting crime: the military. In contemporary times, we have not really concluded as to what role the military can play. Despite various opinions on all sides, eg, the military is trained to kill thus inappropriate to deal with civilian-related crimes vs the military can be used to deal with such crimes vs the military is underutilised vs the military needs to be on standby, etc, what do we really want the military to contribute?
An urgent national discourse is needed on this matter. If it is decided that the military can play a more extensive role now, we must clearly identify them. The military is currently empowered to work with other institutions to deal with domestic matters when needed. But we must work out these other roles.
Fundamentally, how do we adequately prepare the military for these new roles, if required? This revised mandate may not necessarily require more hardware, but other technical, legal, social and psychological skills to empower these men and women.
We are certain that there are numerous resources currently available in the various arms of the military to handle our crime situation other than the tough hardware. There are tremendous “softer” resources and tactical skills present there as well.
The military’s presence in the various high-risk communities will go a long way with the required transition-based training required to deal with crime. Let us not forget the forests are dens for drug-related and other crimes. The military is well-trained to traverse these regions.
The naysayers’ arguments that the military is trained to kill thus inappropriate for civil duty doesn’t seem to hold much water. They have not been required to use this “killing” strength since 1990 when they were called out to deal with the Muslimeen insurgents. As a result, it is time to seriously consider engaging them in “softer” crime-fighting strategies.
Joint army/police patrols have been around for a long time, but we need to think outside the box now. What else can they do? It can’t just be a “show” of physical presence. We have soldiers, coast guard, air guard, reserves etc, and within each division, there is a wide range of skills—in technical, managerial and strategic areas. We can certainly incorporate these in new crime-fighting initiatives.
They can be further used in surveillance and intelligence gathering than what they currently do. This is especially so as we have TT-ISIS fighters returning home. Then, we have South and Latin American criminal elements increasingly rearing their ugly heads.
Additionally, our military can be trained or retooled and placed in high-risk schools, used to protect state witnesses, placed in prisons, used to comb the forests to catch marijuana planters and traffickers, patrol borders and inlets more often, respond to emergency situations when picked up from our national CCTV system, etc. This is the type of out-of-the-box ideas we are talking about for the military.
The Reserves/Volunteers can be used just as the SRPs to fill the gaps, for example, when there are no vehicles/drivers to respond to calls for service. Military officers can also be used in the dry season when bush fires are abundant. Retired military officers with administrative experience can be used to handle some administrative functions and let active officers be out on the field.
If we continue doing the same thing all the time and expect different results, we run the risk of being certified as mad. Let us embrace the need for change in how we do things and move away from stereotypical roles/responsibilities.
The plea now is for the powers-that-be and the citizens to come together and discuss these matters seriously, professionally and within a reasonable time frame, make a decision and then implement.
If any required training and retraining are needed, then let us carve out a plan to get this done with the experts especially in this recessionary period. But, it can and must be done. There are enough models to follow. The Caribbean Institute for Security and Public Safety stands by to play its role.
The Minister of National Security, who is a former military chief, is also a person with tremendous experience in other types of security operations and strategic thinking and action, is ideally poised to lead this mission. Private and corporate security will be ready to assist. We just have to get all of our heads in the right direction and reduce the crime rates.
Many military personnel have excelled in training internationally. When blended with law enforcement and other corporate security and community-driven anti-crime initiatives, crime is set to be on the decline.
Contact the Caribbean Institute for Security and Public Safety for 100 courses in areas such as law enforcement, corporate security, security supervision and management, OSH-related courses, investigations, criminal law, etc. Tel: 223-6999, info@caribbeansecurityinstitute.com or www.caribbeansecurityinstitute.com
Ian Kevin Ramdhanie, MSc,
Principal, CISPS